These provisions implement to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even when the transaction occurred previous to its promulgation. Read more
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which range depending on the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case law citation inside a state court may not be suitable, or perhaps accepted, on the U.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and also the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release like a legally identified conviction. Read more
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it ideal on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Just a couple years ago, searching for case precedent was a difficult and time consuming endeavor, necessitating people to search through print copies of case regulation, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a bunch of case law search possibilities, and several sources offer free access to case legislation.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid of your Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. Read more
We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed via the Constitution and laws on the United States and this State.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation on the police, plus they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its many pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect and never abduct. Read more
10. Based within the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't thought of maintainable and is therefore liable for being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely established now that the provision for proforma promotion will not be alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service composition however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his very own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service for the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a very well-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings here or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.